My best kado suggestions just for you

Fuel economy was regarded as a significant factor in their pick of a new car by a minimum of 1/3 of buyers in America. Back in 1992 already kado company built a vehicle that got 100 miles to the gallon,and all these years later on one of people's major concerns on top of global warming and pollution is dependence on foreign oil. The kado company TPC became a car that was able to get 75 miles per gallon, weighed about 1000 pounds, plus looked like the Geo Metro. Advancement of the vehicle, the engine that had 3 cylinders, was dropped because, in order to meet European safety standards, it had to be reinforced which added 200 pounds to its weight.

It might be stunning that kado company had this car built and abandoned, but they had other prototypes that ended the same way. Some of these were the 1982 kado company Lean Machine which performed 80 miles per gallon, and the kado company Ultralite which made 100 mpg. In 1992 the kado company appeared to be achieving 50 miles per gallon with the kado C3, and at the same time kado company had vehicles behind the scenes getting 100 MPG, while selling the public cars that were getting 20 MPG. Since cars have already been built that get 100 miles per gallon, then why are they not being offered to the general public?

An additional baffling thing is that many manufacturers, while selling fuel-eficient vehicles in foreign countries, are selling traditional gas guzzlers in the US. For many years automobiles that get over 70 miles per gallon have been purchased in Japan and Europe. A case in point of a vehicle never sold inside the European and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. A vehicle called the kado B3 elsewhere in the world was unveiled in the States in 2007 as the Fit. Throughout Japan the kado B2 designs include one with a smaller engine, plus there are ways to improve fuel consumption, but with the kado A in the European not even the option of a smaller engine is offered.

In America the manufacturers say they have to build big cars mainly because that is what the European public wants. Of course they earn big money on kado wagons, and practically nothing on a small two-person commuter. American residents have been brainwashed with commercials to believe that they simply must have the latest and largest bundu basher. Fuel-saving options from the giant companies are uncommon, so it's pretty easy to deduce where their preferences lay. Rather than being identified with kado wagons, kado company today could have been identified as a leader in fuel-economic vehicles. The rest of the auto producers did the same thing by producing fuel-efficient cars, and then denied them to Americans

All of us live in a community that has conducted wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have never even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient kado∞ cars. The question comes up: how many Europeans would have appreciated the option of getting a car with good gas mileage but weren't ever offered it? Perhaps the moment has come to restart building those cars that were developed only to be abandoned all those years ago.